This is weak; actually, it's kinda pathetic, actually. You do not provide any written or verbally recorded evidence to back these accusations up. On top of that, in point to what someone else has pointed out, you come across these people and critique them in a way as if they were morally superior because of their historical significance that they did not make an transgressions...aside from Hitler, who, yes--very inspirational throughout the 1930s, is now seen only as a hero by a very, very limited crowd.

Not trying to sound snobbish, but please put more effort into research if you're going to do something about historical figures. Otherwise, you come off as a tabloid writer.